使用C#,我注意到在使用动态生成类型的实例与简单结构填充列表时性能的显着差异.下面的代码包括4种不同的方法,用于填充包含100,000个对象的列表.
每种方法的表现不同:
Button1:15毫秒
Button2:31毫秒
Button3&4:300毫秒
请注意,按钮3和4的代码来自此主题
谁能解释为什么动态创建的对象更慢?
public struct DataRow { public double t; public double vf; public double im; public double T { get { return t; } set { t = value; } } public double Vf { get { return vf; } set { vf = value; } } public double Im { get { return im; } set { im = value; } } } //Use struct defined above private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { int n = 0; //adding rows ListmyTable = new List (); DataRow myRow = new DataRow(); start = DateTime.Now; while (n < 100000) { myRow.T = n * 1.0; myRow.Vf = 2.0; myRow.Im = 4.0; myTable.Add(myRow); n++; } end = DateTime.Now; System.TimeSpan diff = end.Subtract(start); label2.Text = diff.Seconds.ToString(); label4.Text = diff.Milliseconds.ToString(); dataGridView1.DataSource = myTable; } //define the list as it is done on buttons 3 & 4 but use the static struct private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Type myType = typeof(DataRow); Type listType = typeof(List<>); Type myListType = listType.MakeGenericType(myType); IList myTable = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(myListType); DataRow bRow = new DataRow(); int n = 0; start = DateTime.Now; while (n < 100000) { bRow.t = n * 1.0; bRow.vf = 2.0; bRow.im = 4.0; myTable.Add(bRow); n++; } end = DateTime.Now; System.TimeSpan diff = end.Subtract(start); label2.Text = diff.Seconds.ToString(); label4.Text = diff.Milliseconds.ToString(); dataGridView1.DataSource = myTable; } //Create assy at runtime and load dll private void button3_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Type myType = CreateDynRow(); Assembly myAssy = Assembly.LoadFrom("DynaRowAssy.dll"); Type myRow = myAssy.GetType("DynaRow"); Type listType = typeof(List<>); Type myListType = listType.MakeGenericType(myRow); IList myTable = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(myListType); FieldInfo piT = myRow.GetField("t"); FieldInfo piVf = myRow.GetField("vf"); FieldInfo piIm = myRow.GetField("im"); ValueType aRow = (ValueType)Activator.CreateInstance(myRow); int n = 0; start = DateTime.Now; while (n < 100000) { piT.SetValue(aRow, 1 * n); piVf.SetValue(aRow, 2.0); piIm.SetValue(aRow, 4.0); myTable.Add(aRow); n++; } end = DateTime.Now; System.TimeSpan diff = end.Subtract(start); label2.Text = diff.Seconds.ToString(); label4.Text = diff.Milliseconds.ToString(); dataGridView1.DataSource = myTable; } //create assy at runtime in memory private void button4_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { //build the assembly Type myType = CreateDynRow(); Type listType = typeof(List<>); Type myListType = listType.MakeGenericType(myType); IList myTable = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(myListType); FieldInfo piT = myType.GetField("t"); FieldInfo piVf = myType.GetField("vf"); FieldInfo piIm = myType.GetField("im"); ValueType aRow = (ValueType)Activator.CreateInstance(myType); int n = 0; start = DateTime.Now; while (n < 100000) { piT.SetValue(aRow, 1 * n); piVf.SetValue(aRow, 2.0); piIm.SetValue(aRow, 4.0); myTable.Add(aRow); n++; } end = DateTime.Now; System.TimeSpan diff = end.Subtract(start); label2.Text = diff.Seconds.ToString(); label4.Text = diff.Milliseconds.ToString(); dataGridView1.DataSource = myTable; }
itowlson.. 5
它(主要)不是动态创建:它使用反射(FieldInfo.SetValue)使得button3和button4版本比编译调用时更慢.
解决此问题的一种可能方法是声明代码可以编译的接口,并使动态类型实现此接口.您仍然会通过反射实例化并查询该接口的动态类型,但之后它应该与"静态"引用一样快.
它(主要)不是动态创建:它使用反射(FieldInfo.SetValue)使得button3和button4版本比编译调用时更慢.
解决此问题的一种可能方法是声明代码可以编译的接口,并使动态类型实现此接口.您仍然会通过反射实例化并查询该接口的动态类型,但之后它应该与"静态"引用一样快.