我正在尝试构建一些代码来动态排序Linq IQueryable <>.
显而易见的方法是在这里,使用字符串字符串对列表进行排序
http://dvanderboom.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/dynamically-composing-linq-orderby-clauses/
但是,我想要一个更改 - 编译字段名称的时间检查,以及使用重构/查找所有引用来支持以后的维护的能力.这意味着我想将字段定义为f => f.Name,而不是字符串.
对于我的具体用途,我想封装一些代码,这些代码将决定应该根据用户输入使用命名的"OrderBy"表达式列表中的哪一个,而不必每次都编写不同的代码.
这是我写的内容的要点:
var list = from m Movies select m; // Get our list var sorter = list.GetSorter(...); // Pass in some global user settings object sorter.AddSort("NAME", m=>m.Name); sorter.AddSort("YEAR", m=>m.Year).ThenBy(m=>m.Year); list = sorter.GetSortedList(); ... public class Sorter... public static Sorter GetSorter(this IQueryable source, ...)
GetSortedList函数确定要使用哪个命名排序,这会产生List对象,其中每个FieldData包含在AddSort中传递的字段的MethodInfo和Type值:
public SorterItemAddSort(Func field) { MethodInfo ... = field.Method; Type ... = TypeOf(TKey); // Create item, add item to diction, add fields to item's List<> // The item has the ThenBy method, which just adds another field to the List<> }
我不确定是否有办法以一种允许稍后返回的方式存储整个字段对象(由于它是泛型类型,因此无法进行转换)
有没有办法我可以调整示例代码,或者提出全新的代码,以便在将强类型字段名称存储在某个容器中并进行检索(丢失任何泛型类型转换)后对其进行排序
最简单的方法是让你的AddSort()函数采用Expression
static void Main(string[] args) { var query = from m in Movies select m; var sorter = new Sorter(); sorter.AddSort("NAME", m => m.Name); } class Sorter { public void AddSort(string name, Expression > func) { string fieldName = (func.Body as MemberExpression).Member.Name; } }
在这种情况下,我使用了对象作为func的返回类型,因为它很容易自动转换,但如果需要更多功能,可以根据需要使用不同类型或泛型实现.在这种情况下,由于表达式就在那里进行检查,因此并不重要.
另一种可能的方法是仍然使用Func,并将其存储在字典本身中.然后,当涉及到排序,并且您需要获得要排序的值时,您可以调用类似于:
// assuming a dictionary of fields to sort for, called m_fields m_fields[fieldName](currentItem)
坏消息!我必须学习如何从头到尾阅读规范:-(
然而,既然我花了太多时间而不是工作,我会发布我的结果,希望这会激发人们阅读,思考,理解(重要)然后行动.或者如何使用泛型,lambdas和有趣的Linq东西过于聪明.
我在这个练习中发现的一个巧妙的技巧是那些衍生自的私人内部类
Dictionary
.它们的全部目的是移除所有这些尖括号以提高可读性.
哦,差点忘了代码:
更新:使代码通用,IQueryable
而不是使用IEnumerable
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Linq.Expressions; using NUnit.Framework; using NUnit.Framework.SyntaxHelpers; namespace StackOverflow.StrongTypedLinqSort { [TestFixture] public class SpecifyUserDefinedSorting { private Sortersorter; [SetUp] public void Setup() { var unsorted = from m in Movies select m; sorter = new Sorter (unsorted); sorter.Define("NAME", m1 => m1.Name); sorter.Define("YEAR", m2 => m2.Year); } [Test] public void SortByNameThenYear() { var sorted = sorter.SortBy("NAME", "YEAR"); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.That(movies[0].Name, Is.EqualTo("A")); Assert.That(movies[0].Year, Is.EqualTo(2000)); Assert.That(movies[1].Year, Is.EqualTo(2001)); Assert.That(movies[2].Name, Is.EqualTo("B")); } [Test] public void SortByYearThenName() { var sorted = sorter.SortBy("YEAR", "NAME"); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.That(movies[0].Name, Is.EqualTo("B")); Assert.That(movies[1].Year, Is.EqualTo(2000)); } [Test] public void SortByYearOnly() { var sorted = sorter.SortBy("YEAR"); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.That(movies[0].Name, Is.EqualTo("B")); } private static IQueryable Movies { get { return CreateMovies().AsQueryable(); } } private static IEnumerable CreateMovies() { yield return new Movie {Name = "B", Year = 1990}; yield return new Movie {Name = "A", Year = 2001}; yield return new Movie {Name = "A", Year = 2000}; } } internal class Sorter { public Sorter(IQueryable unsorted) { this.unsorted = unsorted; } public void Define (string name, Expression
> selector) { firstPasses.Add(name, s => s.OrderBy(selector)); nextPasses.Add(name, s => s.ThenBy(selector)); } public IOrderedQueryable SortBy(params string[] names) { IOrderedQueryable result = null; foreach (var name in names) { result = result == null ? SortFirst(name, unsorted) : SortNext(name, result); } return result; } private IOrderedQueryable SortFirst(string name, IQueryable source) { return firstPasses[name].Invoke(source); } private IOrderedQueryable SortNext(string name, IOrderedQueryable source) { return nextPasses[name].Invoke(source); } private readonly IQueryable unsorted; private readonly FirstPasses firstPasses = new FirstPasses(); private readonly NextPasses nextPasses = new NextPasses(); private class FirstPasses : Dictionary , IOrderedQueryable >> {} private class NextPasses : Dictionary , IOrderedQueryable >> {} } internal class Movie { public string Name { get; set; } public int Year { get; set; } } }
根据每个人的贡献,我提出了以下建议.
它提供双向排序以及解决内部问题.这意味着我不需要为每个给定类型的未排序列表创建新的Sorter.为什么不能将未排序的列表传递给分拣机.这意味着我们可以为不同类型创建Sorter的signelton实例......
只是一个想法:
[TestClass] public class SpecifyUserDefinedSorting { private Sortersorter; private IQueryable unsorted; [TestInitialize] public void Setup() { unsorted = from m in Movies select m; sorter = new Sorter (); sorter.Register("Name", m1 => m1.Name); sorter.Register("Year", m2 => m2.Year); } [TestMethod] public void SortByNameThenYear() { var instructions = new List () { new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Name"}, new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Year"} }; var sorted = sorter.SortBy(unsorted, instructions); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Name, "A"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Year, 2000); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Year, 2001); Assert.AreEqual(movies[2].Name, "B"); } [TestMethod] public void SortByNameThenYearDesc() { var instructions = new List () { new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Name", Direction = SortDirection.Descending}, new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Year", Direction = SortDirection.Descending} }; var sorted = sorter.SortBy(unsorted, instructions); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Name, "B"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Year, 1990); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Name, "A"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Year, 2001); Assert.AreEqual(movies[2].Name, "A"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[2].Year, 2000); } [TestMethod] public void SortByNameThenYearDescAlt() { var instructions = new List () { new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Name", Direction = SortDirection.Descending}, new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Year"} }; var sorted = sorter.SortBy(unsorted, instructions); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Name, "B"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Year, 1990); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Name, "A"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Year, 2000); Assert.AreEqual(movies[2].Name, "A"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[2].Year, 2001); } [TestMethod] public void SortByYearThenName() { var instructions = new List () { new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Year"}, new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Name"} }; var sorted = sorter.SortBy(unsorted, instructions); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Name, "B"); Assert.AreEqual(movies[1].Year, 2000); } [TestMethod] public void SortByYearOnly() { var instructions = new List () { new SortInstrcution() {Name = "Year"} }; var sorted = sorter.SortBy(unsorted, instructions); var movies = sorted.ToArray(); Assert.AreEqual(movies[0].Name, "B"); } private static IQueryable Movies { get { return CreateMovies().AsQueryable(); } } private static IEnumerable CreateMovies() { yield return new Movie { Name = "B", Year = 1990 }; yield return new Movie { Name = "A", Year = 2001 }; yield return new Movie { Name = "A", Year = 2000 }; } } public static class SorterExtension { public static IOrderedQueryable SortBy (this IQueryable source, Sorter sorter, IEnumerable instrcutions) { return sorter.SortBy(source, instrcutions); } } public class Sorter { private readonly FirstPasses _FirstPasses; private readonly FirstPasses _FirstDescendingPasses; private readonly NextPasses _NextPasses; private readonly NextPasses _NextDescendingPasses; public Sorter() { this._FirstPasses = new FirstPasses(); this._FirstDescendingPasses = new FirstPasses(); this._NextPasses = new NextPasses(); this._NextDescendingPasses = new NextPasses(); } public void Register (string name, Expression > selector) { this._FirstPasses.Add(name, s => s.OrderBy(selector)); this._FirstDescendingPasses.Add(name, s => s.OrderByDescending(selector)); this._NextPasses.Add(name, s => s.ThenBy(selector)); this._NextDescendingPasses.Add(name, s => s.ThenByDescending(selector)); } public IOrderedQueryable SortBy(IQueryable source, IEnumerable instrcutions) { IOrderedQueryable result = null; foreach (var instrcution in instrcutions) result = result == null ? this.SortFirst(instrcution, source) : this.SortNext(instrcution, result); return result; } private IOrderedQueryable SortFirst(SortInstrcution instrcution, IQueryable source) { if (instrcution.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending) return this._FirstPasses[instrcution.Name].Invoke(source); return this._FirstDescendingPasses[instrcution.Name].Invoke(source); } private IOrderedQueryable SortNext(SortInstrcution instrcution, IOrderedQueryable source) { if (instrcution.Direction == SortDirection.Ascending) return this._NextPasses[instrcution.Name].Invoke(source); return this._NextDescendingPasses[instrcution.Name].Invoke(source); } private class FirstPasses : Dictionary , IOrderedQueryable >> { } private class NextPasses : Dictionary , IOrderedQueryable >> { } } internal class Movie { public string Name { get; set; } public int Year { get; set; } } public class SortInstrcution { public string Name { get; set; } public SortDirection Direction { get; set; } } public enum SortDirection { //Note I have created this enum because the one that exists in the .net // framework is in the web namespace... Ascending, Descending }
请注意,如果您不希望对SortInstrcution具有依赖性,则不会很难更改.
希望这有助于某人.