作为测试的一部分,我想声明一个函数返回一个具有适当内容的向量.因此,我将预期数据作为静态变量提供.但是,我找不到将托管矢量的内容与静态矢量变量进行比较的正确方法.
#[test] fn test_my_data_matches_expected_data () { static expected_data: [u8, ..3] = [1, 2, 3]; let my_data: ~[u8] = ~[1, 2, 3]; // actually returned by the function to test // This would be obvious, but fails: // -> mismatched types: expected `~[u8]` but found `[u8 * 3]` assert_eq!(my_data, expected_data); // Static vectors are told to be available as a borrowed pointer, // so I tried to borrow a pointer from my_data and compare it: // -> mismatched types: expected `&const ~[u8]` but found `[u8 * 3]` assert_eq!(&my_data, expected_data); // Dereferencing also doesn't work: // -> type ~[u8] cannot be dereferenced assert_eq!(*my_data, expected_data); // Copying the static vector to a managed one works, but this // involves creating a copy of the data and actually defeats // the reason to declare it statically: assert_eq!(my_data, expected_data.to_owned()); }
更新:比较它的工作原理解决该问题,所以我结束了与小宏来断言载体面前人人平等分配到静态向量的参考:
macro_rules! assert_typed_eq (($T: ty, $given: expr, $expected: expr) => ({ let given_val: &$T = $given; let expected_val: &$T = $expected; assert_eq!(given_val, expected_val); }))
用法: assert_typed_eq([u8], my_data, expected_data);
实际上有两种静态向量:固定长度的one([u8, .. 3]
)和静态切片(&'static [u8]
).前者与其他类型的载体不能很好地相互作用.后者在这里最有用:
fn main() { static x: &'static [u8] = &[1,2,3]; let y = ~[1u8,2,3]; assert_eq!(y.as_slice(), x); }