有没有更好的方法来创建一个使用jquery的面向对象的类？

我使用jquery 扩展函数来扩展类原型.

例如:

MyWidget = function(name_var) {
  this.init(name_var);
}

$.extend(MyWidget.prototype, {
   // object variables
   widget_name: '',

   init: function(widget_name) {
     // do initialization here
     this.widget_name = widget_name;
   },

   doSomething: function() {
     // an example object method
     alert('my name is '+this.widget_name);
   }
});


// example of using the class built above
var widget1 = new MyWidget('widget one');
widget1.doSomething();

有一个更好的方法吗？是否有一种更简洁的方法来创建上面的类只有一个语句而不是两个？

1> Jonny Buchan..：

---

我非常喜欢John Resig的Simple JavaScript Inheritance.

var MyWidget = Class.extend({
  init: function(widget_name){
    this.widget_name = widget_name;
  },

  doSomething: function() {
    alert('my name is ' + this.widget_name);
  }
});

注意:上面演示的"Class"对象不包含在jQuery本身中 - 它是来自jQuery先生本人的25行片段,在上面的文章中提供.

---

啊.我想我应该先阅读_whole_文章.这是一个干净的解决方案,虽然它确实需要一些额外的设置代码.

2> CrazyMerlin..：

---

为什么不使用JavaScript本身提供的简单OOP ...早在jQuery之前？

var myClass = function(){};
myClass.prototype = {
    some_property: null,
    some_other_property: 0,

    doSomething: function(msg) {
        this.some_property = msg;
        alert(this.some_property);
    }
};

然后你只需要创建一个类的实例:

var myClassObject = new myClass();
myClassObject.doSomething("Hello Worlds");

简单!

---

@CrazyMerlin不应该在构造函数中定义像some_property和some_other_property这样的属性,并在原型上定义方法.这样每个实例都会获得它自己的属性而不是彼此共享它们.

3> Devon..：

---

总结到目前为止我学到的东西:

下面是使Class.extend()在jquery中工作的Base函数(由John Resig 从简单JavaScript继承复制):

// Inspired by base2 and Prototype
(function(){
  var initializing = false, fnTest = /xyz/.test(function(){xyz;}) ? /\b_super\b/ : /.*/;

  // The base Class implementation (does nothing)
  this.Class = function(){};

  // Create a new Class that inherits from this class
  Class.extend = function(prop) {
    var _super = this.prototype;

    // Instantiate a base class (but only create the instance,
    // don't run the init constructor)
    initializing = true;
    var prototype = new this();
    initializing = false;

    // Copy the properties over onto the new prototype
    for (var name in prop) {
      // Check if we're overwriting an existing function
      prototype[name] = typeof prop[name] == "function" &&
        typeof _super[name] == "function" && fnTest.test(prop[name]) ?
        (function(name, fn){
          return function() {
            var tmp = this._super;

            // Add a new ._super() method that is the same method
            // but on the super-class
            this._super = _super[name];

            // The method only need to be bound temporarily, so we
            // remove it when we're done executing
            var ret = fn.apply(this, arguments);       
            this._super = tmp;

            return ret;
          };
        })(name, prop[name]) :
        prop[name];
    }

    // The dummy class constructor
    function Class() {
      // All construction is actually done in the init method
      if ( !initializing && this.init )
        this.init.apply(this, arguments);
    }

    // Populate our constructed prototype object
    Class.prototype = prototype;

    // Enforce the constructor to be what we expect
    Class.constructor = Class;

    // And make this class extendable
    Class.extend = arguments.callee;

    return Class;
  };
})();

一旦你运行了这段代码,那么就可以从insin的答案中得到以下代码:

var MyWidget = Class.extend({
  init: function(widget_name){
    this.widget_name = widget_name;
  },

  doSomething: function() {
    alert('my name is ' + this.widget_name);
  }
});

这是一个很好的,干净的解决方案.但我很想知道是否有人有一个解决方案,不需要添加任何东西到jquery.